Annually, the government here reports on whether it is “closing the gap” betwen indigenous and non indigenous Australians. A key measure is mortality, and the gap between indigenous and non indigenous mortality rates is widening, rather than narrowing.
I’ve written about this before.
According to the latest Closing the Gap report, the first outcome measurement is life expectancy – Close the Gap in life expectancy within a generation, by 2031. So I’ve taken a closer look at mortality rates. And the gap is, sadly, widening.
What I’ve shown in this graph is the age adjusted mortality rate for Indigenous people as a % of the age adjusted mortality rate for all Australians. In 2008, mortality for Indigenous Australians was 163% of the mortality for all Australians. And in 2021, the gap had widened so that indigenous mortality was 188% of mortality for all Australians. So an indigenous person is nearly twice (1.88 times) as likely to die in the next year as an average Australian of the same age and gender.
This calculation takes the mortality by age and gender, and then multiplies it by a notional population mix (the Australian population in 2001). This is important because the rate of mortality for younger people is an order of magnitude lower than older people (whether indigenous or not), so a younger population (such as Australia’s indigenous population) might superficially look as if it is having lower mortality than an older population (such as the whole population of Australia), when it is just that the people are younger.
Another way of looking at this picture is to look at the change in mortality from a common starting point – and what you can see here is that mortality has improved for both Indigenous people and all Australians – but for all Australians it has improved faster, so the gap has got wider rather than narrowing.
And you might wonder why am I looking at mortality rates rather than life expectancy? Its because life expectancy is quite complex to calculate, particularly for smaller populations, so the most recent life expectancy calculation for indigenous people reflects mortality from 2015-2017. The gap in that latest report was 7.8 years – ie the life expectancy of indigenous Australians was 7.8 years lower than the life expectancy of all Australians, which is equivalent to the life expectancy for all Australians around 30 years ago. Given the trend since 2017, the gap in life expectancy is probably bigger than that now.
That gap is not closing, it is getting wider.
A word on data
As an overall measure of the health of a population, life expectancy at birth is one of the best individual numbers, as it captures so many aspects of health of a population, and in general, the data is more certain. However when looking at the mortality of any subset of a population (in this case indigenous people), it is very important that the numerator (deaths) matches the denominator (population). That is very difficult to do, as it depends on the death certificate and the census (which are the main sources of information in this case) having matching likelihoods of capturing someone’s indigenous status. The ABS has done a lot of work on this matching process, (described here in the CDE project report) but it is imperfect, and sitting in on one conversation about how difficult it is reminded me how important it is to have people from the community themselves being involved in this kind of work.
Useful Sources
- Latest information comes from the report on mortality for 2021 here from the ABS.
- Earlier mortality measures come from the 2017 report here from the ABS into Leading causes of death in Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islander people
- The AIHW had a close look at trends in this report from 2001 – 2015 (although the numbers aren’t completely comparable, given slightly different definitions)
- Anothe report from the AIHW looks at life expectancy to 2011
- The most recent report into Aboriginal life expectancy is from the ABS in 2018, showing a gap for Australia as a whole of 7.8 years
Bit of Beauty
This eye is from a Sydney water dragon, taken by Geekinsydney.
As a lay person, I can only remark that the article
is written with great empathy.
As far as the “Thing of Beauty”, I beg to differ.
Love